Outdoor routines community signal

Skating and tobogganing asset presence across Calgary communities

Relative presence of mapped skating-rink surfaces and toboggan-hill records inside the official community boundary.

This page compares one public-data signal at a time. It is a shortlist tool rather than an overall ranking, and every leading record links to a full community profile with the underlying evidence and local context.

Published formula

Boundary-normalized skating and tobogganing asset density 50%, total mapped assets 30%, and represented winter-asset categories 20%.

This comparison only covers City Parks skating-rink and toboggan-hill records assigned by polygon centroid. It does not include every informal hill or community-operated rink and does not establish opening, ice condition, supervision, lighting, route distance, maintenance or quality.

Evidence used

This is a direct comparison. The current ingredients include City Parks sport grouping areas, skating-rink surfaces, toboggan-hill records, official community boundaries, boundary area.

Communities in the high measured range

Elbow Park: 80/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 3 mapped winter-recreation assets across 1 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 3 Elboya: 90/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 2 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 1, Tobogganing 1 Glendale: 83/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 2 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 1, Tobogganing 1 Kelvin Grove: 80/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 2 mapped winter-recreation assets across 1 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 2 Kingsland: 94/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 3 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 2, Tobogganing 1 Maple Ridge: 84/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 3 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 2, Tobogganing 1 Mayland Heights: 94/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 4 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 3, Tobogganing 1 Richmond: 90/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 3 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 2, Tobogganing 1 Southwood: 85/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 3 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 2, Tobogganing 1 St. Andrews Heights: 86/100; Mapped winter-recreation assets: 2 mapped winter-recreation assets across 2 of 2 tracked categories inside the official boundary; Skating 1, Tobogganing 1

High-range examples are shown alphabetically. Use several community profiles and an exact-address review before making a housing decision.